Operations · Side quest build

How to Vibe Code Your Own Breezy HR Alternative

A hiring pipeline your small team can follow. Breezy HR charges $157–$529 per month — that’s $1884–$6348 a year — for something you can replace with focused software of your own. Here is the honest scope, the honest timeline, and the exact prompt to hand your coding agent.

Official pricing. Startup annual monthly equivalent through Business monthly; recruiting add-ons excluded. Checked October 19, 2026.

from 3 daysKeep hiring understandable

Who this replacement is for

This build targets a small company hiring for a few open roles. The goal: collect applications, organize interviews, and record human hiring decisions. If you need more than that, keep paying — the point of building it yourself is owning a tool shaped exactly like your workflow, not re-implementing a venture-funded roadmap.

How long it actually takes

One number would be a lie, so here are three. Each tier is a real, usable product — pick the one that matches how much of Breezy HR you actually use.

EstimateWhat you get
3 daysjob pages, applications, candidate stages
1 weekinterview scorecards, permissions, retention controls
3 months+job-board distribution, screening, onboarding, HR integrations — the part you should probably skip

What a minimal Breezy HR alternative needs

Data model

Job, Candidate, Application, Interview, Scorecard

Integrations

private object storage, transactional email

Capability context

Astro, HTMX, D1

The guardrail

Keep resumes private, scope reviewers to their assigned jobs, define retention dates, and leave every hiring decision to people.

Deliberate non-goals

Do not rank candidates with AI, perform background checks, distribute to job boards, or process payroll.

The complete build prompt

Copy this into your coding agent of choice. It is scoped for a useful v1 — journeys, screens, business rules, data model, security, tests, and acceptance scenarios included. Pick your stack:

You are building a production-ready software product named “Hirelane”, a deliberately focused alternative to Breezy HR. Build a complete, usable vertical slice—not a landing page, static mockup, or disconnected collection of components.

WORKING AGREEMENT
Before writing implementation code, produce a short technical plan that names the routes or pages, server actions or endpoints, data tables, important state transitions, authorization boundaries, background jobs, and external adapters. Resolve contradictions in favor of the narrow audience and non-goals below. Prefer a small, legible architecture over speculative abstraction, but do not omit persistence, validation, error handling, or tests.

PRODUCT BRIEF
Primary user: a small company hiring for a few open roles.
Primary outcome: collect applications, organize interviews, and record human hiring decisions.
Product principle: optimize the exact workflow below instead of copying the full breadth of Breezy HR. A first-time user should understand what to do from the interface itself, without a tour or documentation.

END-TO-END USER JOURNEYS
Implement all of these flows through the real interface and persistent data layer:
1. The hiring manager publishes a role and reviews incoming applications and private resumes.
2. Assigned interviewers submit scorecards; the manager records a human decision and later reviews retention deadlines.

SCREENS AND INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
Build these as coherent responsive views. Each screen must specify its primary action, secondary actions, visible status, validation feedback, empty state, loading or pending state, success confirmation, and recoverable failure state.
1. Public careers list and role application form.
2. Private candidate pipeline scoped to assigned jobs.
3. Candidate detail with resume, interview scorecards, and retention actions.

CORE CAPABILITIES
1. public role pages and an application form with private resume upload
2. candidate pipeline with screening, interview, offer, and closed stages
3. structured interview scorecards with role-specific questions
4. candidate notes restricted to assigned hiring staff
5. retention review queue and candidate-data deletion

DETAILED BEHAVIOR AND BUSINESS RULES
Treat these as server-enforced product requirements, not interface suggestions:
1. Applicant files are private and available only to reviewers assigned to that job.
2. Keep scorecards individually attributed and preserve edits in an audit trail.
3. Delete or anonymize candidate data according to a configured retention policy, including stored files.

DATA MODEL AND LIFECYCLE
Design a small relational schema centered on Job, Candidate, Application, Interview, Scorecard. Before implementing it, document:
1. Each table’s purpose, primary key, ownership or tenant boundary, timestamps, status fields, and important attributes.
2. Foreign keys, uniqueness constraints, check constraints, indexes needed by the named screens, and transaction boundaries for multi-record changes.
3. The allowed lifecycle or state transitions, who may trigger each transition, which transitions are terminal or reversible, and what audit history must remain immutable.
4. Archive, retention, and deletion behavior, including what happens to dependent records and external files.
5. Idempotency strategy for submissions, jobs, imports, notifications, webhooks, or retries where applicable.
Use migrations rather than ad-hoc schema creation. Store time instants consistently and retain named timezone context whenever local schedules or dates matter. Never rely on a counter, disabled button, or client-side check to preserve a business invariant.

USERS, AUTHENTICATION, AND PERMISSIONS
Implement only the roles required by the stated audience. Make the ownership and visibility model explicit before coding. Enforce authorization in every server-side query and mutation, including search, exports, attachments, live updates, and guessed URLs—not merely by hiding controls. Use secure session defaults, protect state-changing requests, and provide an understandable signed-out, expired-session, and forbidden state. Seed distinct users when multiple roles are required so permissions can be demonstrated and tested.

INTERACTION AND VISUAL DIRECTION
The product should feel fast, calm, focused, and credible rather than like a generic admin template. Use a clear visual hierarchy, restrained color, readable typography, generous hit targets, and consistent placement for primary actions. Start with server-rendered HTML and progressively enhance only the interactions that benefit from it. The core workflow must remain understandable if enhancement fails.

Start with server-rendered Astro pages and ordinary HTML forms. Use HTMX for form submissions, partial navigation, and server-driven updates, then Alpine.js only for small local browser state. The core workflow must remain understandable if either enhancement layer fails.

Design mobile layouts intentionally instead of simply stacking desktop panels. Support keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic landmarks, explicit labels, useful page titles, reduced-motion preferences, and screen-reader announcements for asynchronous results. Never use color alone to communicate state. Destructive actions require clear scope and confirmation; safe repeated actions should be idempotent.

TECHNICAL DIRECTION
Build this version with the AHA stack: Astro for routing, layouts, and server-rendered pages; HTMX for interactions that benefit from HTML fragment responses; and Alpine.js for small, local interface state. Prefer Cloudflare D1 for relational persistence, R2 for object storage, Workers for server endpoints and scheduled work, Durable Objects only for coordinated real-time state, and Workflows or Queues for durable background jobs—but only when the product requirements call for them.

Keep domain rules in testable server-side modules instead of route handlers or UI components. Separate persistence, external providers, and background work behind small interfaces without building a framework. Prefer ordinary HTML forms and URLs for durable navigation; use optimistic interaction only when failure can be reconciled clearly.

The product brief currently identifies Astro, HTMX, D1 as capability context. Preserve any required native, browser-only, edge, storage, real-time, or background-processing capability through a narrow adapter appropriate to the selected framework. If the core workflow genuinely requires native or browser APIs, keep that runtime as the primary execution surface rather than simulating inaccessible capabilities or inventing an unnecessary web surface.

Integrate with private object storage and transactional email. For every integration:
- List required environment variables in an .env.example without real secrets.
- Add a small adapter with timeouts, normalized errors, and a deterministic local fake or development path.
- Verify inbound signatures and deduplicate provider events where supported.
- Keep credentials server-side, encrypt long-lived provider tokens at rest, and redact secrets and sensitive payloads from logs.
- Define retry, backoff, and idempotency behavior for any side effect that can be repeated.

SECURITY AND PRIVACY
Keep resumes private, scope reviewers to their assigned jobs, define retention dates, and leave every hiring decision to people.
Validate, normalize, and length-limit all untrusted input on the server. Escape rendered content by default, sanitize any intentionally accepted markup, rate-limit public or abuse-prone actions, and use private object storage plus short-lived authorized URLs for sensitive files. Collect the minimum personal data necessary for the named workflow. Document retention and deletion behavior. Add specific protections for the riskier surfaces in this app, such as uploads, redirects, outbound requests, email delivery, OAuth, webhooks, CSV import or export, and real-time connections.

ACCEPTANCE SCENARIOS
Automate these app-specific scenarios at the most appropriate level:
1. An interviewer assigned to one role cannot access another role through search or downloads.
2. Duplicate application retries produce one application for the submitted request.
3. Candidate deletion removes the resume and excludes the record from subsequent exports.

TESTING
Add focused unit tests for state transitions, authorization predicates, normalization, date or money calculations, and other risky domain rules. Add integration tests for persistence constraints and each external adapter’s success, timeout, retry, and rejection paths. Add at least one browser-level test for every end-to-end journey above, including one small-screen viewport. Tests must use isolated data and run through a documented single command.

OPERATIONS AND FAILURE RECOVERY
Add structured server logs with request, job, or event correlation IDs but no secrets or unnecessarily sensitive data. Make failures actionable in both the interface and logs. Background work must expose pending, succeeded, failed, and retrying states where relevant; do not silently swallow errors. Include safe database migration and rollback guidance, seed data, backup and restore notes, external-data cleanup behavior, and a basic health or diagnostic path appropriate to the stack.

DELIVERABLES
Ship the working application, migrations, representative seed data, tests, .env.example, and a concise README. The README must cover prerequisites, local setup, environment variables, migrations, seed and test commands, deployment, integration setup, backup and restore, security decisions, and known limitations. Seed data should exercise the happy path plus at least one empty, failed, overdue, expired, archived, or permission-restricted state relevant to the product.

DEFINITION OF DONE
The app is complete when a fresh developer can follow the README, create and migrate the database, run the app, sign in as each relevant role, complete every named journey using real persisted data, refresh without losing state, recover from common failures, and use the core interface on phone and desktop. All acceptance scenarios pass, permission boundaries are covered by tests, and no core screen is left as a placeholder.

NON-GOALS
Do not rank candidates with AI, perform background checks, distribute to job boards, or process payroll.

Build just one piece

Not ready to replace all of Breezy HR? Fine. These are the peculiar sub-problems hiding inside it — the parts that are actually interesting to build. Each one is a standalone prompt, scoped to an evening, no strings attached to the full build.

The resume behind the same permission checkProtect files as carefully as candidate pages.
Build private resume download authorization based on job reviewer membership. Validate file size and type on upload and issue short-lived download URLs. Done when guessing a resume ID reveals neither the file nor candidate metadata.
The interview scorecard with an authorKeep structured feedback attributable.
Build role-specific interview scorecards with required questions, author, submitted time, and revision history. Limit access to the hiring team. Done when an edit preserves the previous response and exported feedback identifies which question version was answered.
The application retry that stays one applicationDeduplicate the submission rather than the person.
Build application submission using a unique request ID and a transaction linking applicant details and resume metadata. Permit separate deliberate applications to different roles. Done when network retries create one application and a failed upload cannot leave a completed application missing its resume.
The retention review that includes attachmentsDeleting the record also retires the file.
Build candidate retention with review deadlines, explicit deletion confirmation, and a durable file-cleanup queue. Done when deleted candidates disappear from search and exports immediately while failed attachment cleanup remains visible and safely retryable.

Frequently asked questions

How long does it take to build your own Breezy HR?

A basic version — job pages, applications, candidate stages — takes about 3 days. Roughly 1 week gets you a solid v1 with interview scorecards, permissions, retention controls. Matching everything Breezy HR really does (job-board distribution, screening, onboarding, HR integrations) is closer to 3 months+, which is exactly why you should scope down instead.

How much does Breezy HR cost if I keep subscribing?

Breezy HR runs $157–$529 per month on public paid plans, which is $1884–$6348 per year. A focused self-built replacement costs your build time plus close-to-zero hosting.

What stack should I use to build a Breezy HR alternative?

The build prompt on this page ships in four flavors: the AHA stack (Astro, HTMX, Alpine.js), Next.js, Laravel, and Ruby on Rails. The capability context for this product is Astro, HTMX, D1. Pick the stack you already know — the scope matters more than the framework.

What features does a minimal Breezy HR replacement need?

A useful v1 needs: public role pages and an application form with private resume upload; candidate pipeline with screening, interview, offer, and closed stages; structured interview scorecards with role-specific questions; candidate notes restricted to assigned hiring staff; retention review queue and candidate-data deletion. Everything else is scope creep until you personally miss it.

What should I deliberately not build?

Do not rank candidates with AI, perform background checks, distribute to job boards, or process payroll.

Prompt copied. Go ship it.