Operations · Weekend build

Build your own Expensify

Submit receipts, approve totals, export for accounting. Expensify charges $5–$9 per person per month — that’s $60–$108 a year per person — for something you can replace with focused software of your own. Here is the honest scope, the honest timeline, and the exact prompt to hand your coding agent.

from 12 hoursFor simple reimbursements

Who this replacement is for

This build targets a small company with one straightforward employee reimbursement policy. The goal: collect expense evidence, route reports for approval, and export approved data. If you need more than that, keep paying — the point of building it yourself is owning a tool shaped exactly like your workflow, not re-implementing a venture-funded roadmap.

How long it actually takes

One number would be a lie, so here are three. Each tier is a real, usable product — pick the one that matches how much of Expensify you actually use.

EstimateWhat you get
12 hoursreceipt upload, expense entry, csv export
1 weekreports, approval workflow, multi-currency, email notifications
3 months+receipt ocr, corporate cards, moving actual money — the part you should probably skip

What a minimal Expensify alternative needs

Data model

Employee, Expense, Receipt, ExpenseReport, ApprovalEvent

Integrations

R2 object storage, email notifications

Capability context

Astro, R2, D1

The guardrail

Use private signed receipt URLs, immutable approval history, and explicit currency handling.

Deliberate non-goals

Do not calculate tax, move money, issue cards, scan receipts with AI, or replace accounting software.

The complete build prompt

Copy this into your coding agent of choice. It is scoped for a useful v1 — journeys, screens, business rules, data model, security, tests, and acceptance scenarios included. Pick your stack:

You are building a production-ready software product named “Receiptbox”, a deliberately focused alternative to Expensify. Build a complete, usable vertical slice—not a landing page, static mockup, or disconnected collection of components.

WORKING AGREEMENT
Before writing implementation code, produce a short technical plan that names the routes or pages, server actions or endpoints, data tables, important state transitions, authorization boundaries, background jobs, and external adapters. Resolve contradictions in favor of the narrow audience and non-goals below. Prefer a small, legible architecture over speculative abstraction, but do not omit persistence, validation, error handling, or tests.

PRODUCT BRIEF
Primary user: a small company with one straightforward employee reimbursement policy.
Primary outcome: collect expense evidence, route reports for approval, and export approved data.
Product principle: optimize the exact workflow below instead of copying the full breadth of Expensify. A first-time user should understand what to do from the interface itself, without a tour or documentation.

END-TO-END USER JOURNEYS
Implement all of these flows through the real interface and persistent data layer:
1. An employee photographs a receipt on a phone, uploads it, enters merchant, date, amount, currency, category, and note, then adds the expense to a draft report.
2. The employee reviews report totals and evidence, submits it, and a manager returns one expense with a comment for correction before the employee resubmits.
3. The manager approves the corrected report; accounting exports the approved month with private receipt references and records the report as reimbursed.

SCREENS AND INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
Build these as coherent responsive views. Each screen must specify its primary action, secondary actions, visible status, validation feedback, empty state, loading or pending state, success confirmation, and recoverable failure state.
1. My expenses: mobile upload action, unreported expenses, draft reports, status filters, merchant, date, amount, currency, category, receipt state, and create-report action.
2. Report editor: report title and period, included expenses, missing-evidence warnings, per-currency totals, remove and edit actions, activity history, and submit control.
3. Manager review: submitted queue, employee and date filters, receipt preview, expense detail, report totals, approval history, comment, return, and approve actions.
4. Accounting export: approved and reimbursed filters, month and currency selection, CSV preview, receipt-link inclusion, export history, and mark-reimbursed action.

CORE CAPABILITIES
1. mobile-friendly receipt upload and manual expense entry
2. merchant, date, amount, currency, category, and note
3. reports containing multiple expenses with draft, submitted, approved, and reimbursed states
4. manager review with comment, approve, or return
5. monthly CSV export with receipt links for accounting

DETAILED BEHAVIOR AND BUSINESS RULES
Treat these as server-enforced product requirements, not interface suggestions:
1. Validate receipt type and size, store objects privately, authorize every preview request, and issue short-lived signed URLs that never appear in permanent exports or logs.
2. Store monetary amounts as integer minor units with ISO currency codes, calculate totals server-side per currency, and never silently convert or combine currencies.
3. Enforce draft, submitted, approved, returned, and reimbursed transitions server-side; submitted reports are locked and every transition records actor, time, and comment.
4. Generate CSV exports from an immutable approved snapshot, escape spreadsheet formulas, record who exported what, and make repeated export requests produce the same rows.

DATA MODEL AND LIFECYCLE
Design a small relational schema centered on Employee, Expense, Receipt, ExpenseReport, ApprovalEvent. Before implementing it, document:
1. Each table’s purpose, primary key, ownership or tenant boundary, timestamps, status fields, and important attributes.
2. Foreign keys, uniqueness constraints, check constraints, indexes needed by the named screens, and transaction boundaries for multi-record changes.
3. The allowed lifecycle or state transitions, who may trigger each transition, which transitions are terminal or reversible, and what audit history must remain immutable.
4. Archive, retention, and deletion behavior, including what happens to dependent records and external files.
5. Idempotency strategy for submissions, jobs, imports, notifications, webhooks, or retries where applicable.
Use migrations rather than ad-hoc schema creation. Store time instants consistently and retain named timezone context whenever local schedules or dates matter. Never rely on a counter, disabled button, or client-side check to preserve a business invariant.

USERS, AUTHENTICATION, AND PERMISSIONS
Implement only the roles required by the stated audience. Make the ownership and visibility model explicit before coding. Enforce authorization in every server-side query and mutation, including search, exports, attachments, live updates, and guessed URLs—not merely by hiding controls. Use secure session defaults, protect state-changing requests, and provide an understandable signed-out, expired-session, and forbidden state. Seed distinct users when multiple roles are required so permissions can be demonstrated and tested.

INTERACTION AND VISUAL DIRECTION
The product should feel fast, calm, focused, and credible rather than like a generic admin template. Use a clear visual hierarchy, restrained color, readable typography, generous hit targets, and consistent placement for primary actions. Start with server-rendered HTML and progressively enhance only the interactions that benefit from it. The core workflow must remain understandable if enhancement fails.

Start with server-rendered Astro pages and ordinary HTML forms. Use HTMX for form submissions, partial navigation, and server-driven updates, then Alpine.js only for small local browser state. The core workflow must remain understandable if either enhancement layer fails.

Design mobile layouts intentionally instead of simply stacking desktop panels. Support keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic landmarks, explicit labels, useful page titles, reduced-motion preferences, and screen-reader announcements for asynchronous results. Never use color alone to communicate state. Destructive actions require clear scope and confirmation; safe repeated actions should be idempotent.

TECHNICAL DIRECTION
Build this version with the AHA stack: Astro for routing, layouts, and server-rendered pages; HTMX for interactions that benefit from HTML fragment responses; and Alpine.js for small, local interface state. Prefer Cloudflare D1 for relational persistence, R2 for object storage, Workers for server endpoints and scheduled work, Durable Objects only for coordinated real-time state, and Workflows or Queues for durable background jobs—but only when the product requirements call for them.

Keep domain rules in testable server-side modules instead of route handlers or UI components. Separate persistence, external providers, and background work behind small interfaces without building a framework. Prefer ordinary HTML forms and URLs for durable navigation; use optimistic interaction only when failure can be reconciled clearly.

The product brief currently identifies Astro, R2, D1 as capability context. Preserve any required native, browser-only, edge, storage, real-time, or background-processing capability through a narrow adapter appropriate to the selected framework. If the core workflow genuinely requires native or browser APIs, keep that runtime as the primary execution surface rather than simulating inaccessible capabilities or inventing an unnecessary web surface.

Integrate with R2 object storage and email notifications. For every integration:
- List required environment variables in an .env.example without real secrets.
- Add a small adapter with timeouts, normalized errors, and a deterministic local fake or development path.
- Verify inbound signatures and deduplicate provider events where supported.
- Keep credentials server-side, encrypt long-lived provider tokens at rest, and redact secrets and sensitive payloads from logs.
- Define retry, backoff, and idempotency behavior for any side effect that can be repeated.

SECURITY AND PRIVACY
Use private signed receipt URLs, immutable approval history, and explicit currency handling.
Validate, normalize, and length-limit all untrusted input on the server. Escape rendered content by default, sanitize any intentionally accepted markup, rate-limit public or abuse-prone actions, and use private object storage plus short-lived authorized URLs for sensitive files. Collect the minimum personal data necessary for the named workflow. Document retention and deletion behavior. Add specific protections for the riskier surfaces in this app, such as uploads, redirects, outbound requests, email delivery, OAuth, webhooks, CSV import or export, and real-time connections.

ACCEPTANCE SCENARIOS
Automate these app-specific scenarios at the most appropriate level:
1. Given a report missing a required receipt or category, submission is blocked and each invalid expense is linked from the report-level error summary.
2. Given a manager returns a submitted report, the employee can edit it, the return comment remains in history, and resubmission creates a new approval event.
3. Given an approved multi-currency report, export emits explicit currency values without conversion and an unauthorized user cannot open any receipt link.

TESTING
Add focused unit tests for state transitions, authorization predicates, normalization, date or money calculations, and other risky domain rules. Add integration tests for persistence constraints and each external adapter’s success, timeout, retry, and rejection paths. Add at least one browser-level test for every end-to-end journey above, including one small-screen viewport. Tests must use isolated data and run through a documented single command.

OPERATIONS AND FAILURE RECOVERY
Add structured server logs with request, job, or event correlation IDs but no secrets or unnecessarily sensitive data. Make failures actionable in both the interface and logs. Background work must expose pending, succeeded, failed, and retrying states where relevant; do not silently swallow errors. Include safe database migration and rollback guidance, seed data, backup and restore notes, external-data cleanup behavior, and a basic health or diagnostic path appropriate to the stack.

DELIVERABLES
Ship the working application, migrations, representative seed data, tests, .env.example, and a concise README. The README must cover prerequisites, local setup, environment variables, migrations, seed and test commands, deployment, integration setup, backup and restore, security decisions, and known limitations. Seed data should exercise the happy path plus at least one empty, failed, overdue, expired, archived, or permission-restricted state relevant to the product.

DEFINITION OF DONE
The app is complete when a fresh developer can follow the README, create and migrate the database, run the app, sign in as each relevant role, complete every named journey using real persisted data, refresh without losing state, recover from common failures, and use the core interface on phone and desktop. All acceptance scenarios pass, permission boundaries are covered by tests, and no core screen is left as a placeholder.

NON-GOALS
Do not calculate tax, move money, issue cards, scan receipts with AI, or replace accounting software.

Frequently asked questions

How long does it take to build your own Expensify?

A basic version — receipt upload, expense entry, csv export — takes about 12 hours. Roughly 1 week gets you a solid v1 with reports, approval workflow, multi-currency, email notifications. Matching everything Expensify really does (receipt ocr, corporate cards, moving actual money) is closer to 3 months+, which is exactly why you should scope down instead.

How much does Expensify cost if I keep subscribing?

Expensify runs $5–$9 per person per month on public paid plans, which is $60–$108 per year for every person on your team. A focused self-built replacement costs your build time plus close-to-zero hosting.

What stack should I use to build a Expensify alternative?

The build prompt on this page ships in four flavors: the AHA stack (Astro, HTMX, Alpine.js), Next.js, Laravel, and Ruby on Rails. The capability context for this product is Astro, R2, D1. Pick the stack you already know — the scope matters more than the framework.

What features does a minimal Expensify replacement need?

A useful v1 needs: mobile-friendly receipt upload and manual expense entry; merchant, date, amount, currency, category, and note; reports containing multiple expenses with draft, submitted, approved, and reimbursed states; manager review with comment, approve, or return; monthly CSV export with receipt links for accounting. Everything else is scope creep until you personally miss it.

What should I deliberately not build?

Do not calculate tax, move money, issue cards, scan receipts with AI, or replace accounting software.

Prompt copied. Go ship it.